As noted, because bidi isn't the creator of the PDF file and still claims it is. "Created by Xe(La)TeX with bidi package" (something like "Created by LaTeX with hyperref package") would be a little bit more acceptable, don't you think?
________________________________ From: Vafa Khalighi <[email protected]> To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, March 11, 2010 12:33:03 PM Subject: Re: [XeTeX] PDF Creator: "bidi"? >This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf >file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary >language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand >that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very unfair >to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex. > > I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this unfair? -- Best wishes, Vafa Khalighi
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
