On 27 October 2011 16:52, Shrisha Rao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Being able to use UTF-8 codings in such scripts to produce outputs in other
> scripts would require n × n mappings, as against 1 × n if the input is only
> in ITRANS.
>

Actually, 1×n is all that is required, as long as the mappings are
bijectional, but this requires two passes. Firstly to convert to ITRANS,
then secondly to the desired script. I can identify one instance where the
mapping is not bijectional, as ব in Bengali stands for both ब and व in
Devanagari, and this has already been mentioned here, I believe, but even
so, a set of n×n mappings doesn't help this situation.

Andrew

--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to