http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/
But there are lots of new stuff, so bugs are expected. Use on your own. Regards, Khaled On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:15:16AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > Is the git repository that you are using accessible only to the > unicode-math developers, or to anyone with git software > (http://git-scm.com/ or http://msysgit.github.com/ or ?) installed on > their machine? > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> wrote: > > The issue is now fixed in git repository. > > > > Regards, > > Khaled > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:48:51AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > >> Thanks for reproducing the issue. This is clearly an engine bug (unlike > >> old TeX, the over/under braces are handled solely by the engine not > >> constructed by macros). > >> > >> I’ll try to debug this now it is reproducible, but whatever fix I can > >> come up with will not be available before the next XeTeX release (TeX > >> Live 2013), so It won’t solve your immediate problem, sorry. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Khaled > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:50:17PM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > >> > Khaled, thanks for the great suggestion. I used an open type math font > >> > (xits-math.otf) and the problem now shows up multiple times. In the > >> > attached pdf, the shift occurs on pages 3, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 23, 28, > >> > 34, ... > >> > > >> > My setup includes these: > >> > \usepackage[no-config,no-math]{fontspec} % font selection for xelatex > >> > \usepackage{xunicode} % unicode character support > >> > \usepackage{amsmath} % AMS math package > >> > \usepackage{unicode-math} % unicode math support > >> > \unimathsetup{math-style=ISO,bold-style=ISO,vargreek-shape=TeX} > >> > \setmathfont{xits-math.otf} > >> > \setmathfont[range={\mathcal,\mathbfcal},StylisticSet=1]{xits-math.otf} > >> > > >> > Attached is a tex file and pdf output. Can anyone else reproduce the > >> > errors? Any suggestions? > >> > > >> > command line: xelatex underbrace > >> > > >> > Dan > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > I’ve seen this once with OpenType math fonts, but I wasn’t able to > >> > > reproduce it again. Trying using the same fonts in your minimal > >> > > example, > >> > > since it is probably and OpenType math-only issue. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Khaled > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:13:51AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > >> > >> I did make a quick minimal example (but not exactly the same as in the > >> > >> previous email) that uses the underbrace 1000 (?) times. But so far > >> > >> apparently no success in getting the problem to show itself again. > >> > >> > >> > >> If interested, please see attachments. > >> > >> > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daniel Greenhoe > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > For some time now I have been having *sporadic* problems with > >> > >> > underbraces being shifted to the right by maybe 15mm or so. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The problem is sporadic---it appears sometimes, but on the next > >> > >> > compile may well have disappeared. The document I am currently > >> > >> > working > >> > >> > on contains several hundred pages. I can try to put together a > >> > >> > minimal > >> > >> > example...but that may be of limited use since it may be difficult > >> > >> > to > >> > >> > get the problem to show itself when I want it to show itself. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > So, before I do that, might anyone have an idea of what might be > >> > >> > the problem? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > There is a screen capture of a shift. The right underbrace has been > >> > >> > shifted far to the right. It should be like the underbrace on the > >> > >> > left. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Here is my current underbrace macro: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > \newcommand{\mcom}[3][c]{\ensuremath{% > >> > >> > \begin{array}[t]{#1}% > >> > >> > \underbrace{#2}\\% > >> > >> > \text{\addfontfeatures{Color=mcom}\scriptsize{#3}}% > >> > >> > \end{array}% > >> > >> > }}% > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The color mcom is simply defined liked this: > >> > >> > \definecolor{mcom} {cmyk}{0,0,0,1} > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The \mcom macro can be used something like this: > >> > >> > \[ \mcom{\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1}{this is a trig. identity} \] > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I am compiling with XeLaTeX from a TeXlive distribution. > >> > >> > Any ideas? > >> > >> > Many thanks in advance, > >> > >> > Dan > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > >> > >> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -------------------------------------------------- > >> > > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > >> > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -------------------------------------------------- > >> > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > >> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > >> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
