On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Greenhoe <[email protected]> wrote: > Does this mean that the fix by Khaled did not make it into the latest > win32 binary? Would anyone happen to know when a fixed one might > possibly be available?
P.S. Sorry for all the whining. Dan On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Greenhoe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > The issue is now fixed in git repository. > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/ > > This link references http://tug.org/texlive/build.html which lists > Akira Kakuto as the builder for win32. Akira Kakuto apparently > maintains http://w32tex.org/. As of 2013 February 11, the newest file > in that repository is xetex-w32.tar.xz updated 2013 February 11 > 11:04am. However, in the change log for 2013 February 11 it says > "(04) xetex-w32.tar.xz > Update libpoppler (0.22.1). > A bug in the unicode-math is not fixed, because the fixed one > contains rather large differences and it is under discussion." > > Does this mean that the fix by Khaled did not make it into the latest > win32 binary? Would anyone happen to know when a fixed one might > possibly be available? > > Dan > > > >> >> But there are lots of new stuff, so bugs are expected. Use on your own. >> >> Regards, >> Khaled >> >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:15:16AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: >>> Is the git repository that you are using accessible only to the >>> unicode-math developers, or to anyone with git software >>> (http://git-scm.com/ or http://msysgit.github.com/ or ?) installed on >>> their machine? >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > The issue is now fixed in git repository. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Khaled >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:48:51AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: >>> >> Thanks for reproducing the issue. This is clearly an engine bug (unlike >>> >> old TeX, the over/under braces are handled solely by the engine not >>> >> constructed by macros). >>> >> >>> >> I’ll try to debug this now it is reproducible, but whatever fix I can >>> >> come up with will not be available before the next XeTeX release (TeX >>> >> Live 2013), so It won’t solve your immediate problem, sorry. >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Khaled >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:50:17PM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: >>> >> > Khaled, thanks for the great suggestion. I used an open type math font >>> >> > (xits-math.otf) and the problem now shows up multiple times. In the >>> >> > attached pdf, the shift occurs on pages 3, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 23, 28, >>> >> > 34, ... >>> >> > >>> >> > My setup includes these: >>> >> > \usepackage[no-config,no-math]{fontspec} % font selection for xelatex >>> >> > \usepackage{xunicode} % unicode character support >>> >> > \usepackage{amsmath} % AMS math package >>> >> > \usepackage{unicode-math} % unicode math support >>> >> > \unimathsetup{math-style=ISO,bold-style=ISO,vargreek-shape=TeX} >>> >> > \setmathfont{xits-math.otf} >>> >> > >>> >> > \setmathfont[range={\mathcal,\mathbfcal},StylisticSet=1]{xits-math.otf} >>> >> > >>> >> > Attached is a tex file and pdf output. Can anyone else reproduce the >>> >> > errors? Any suggestions? >>> >> > >>> >> > command line: xelatex underbrace >>> >> > >>> >> > Dan >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > I’ve seen this once with OpenType math fonts, but I wasn’t able to >>> >> > > reproduce it again. Trying using the same fonts in your minimal >>> >> > > example, >>> >> > > since it is probably and OpenType math-only issue. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Regards, >>> >> > > Khaled >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:13:51AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: >>> >> > >> I did make a quick minimal example (but not exactly the same as in >>> >> > >> the >>> >> > >> previous email) that uses the underbrace 1000 (?) times. But so far >>> >> > >> apparently no success in getting the problem to show itself again. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> If interested, please see attachments. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> Dan >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daniel Greenhoe >>> >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >> > For some time now I have been having *sporadic* problems with >>> >> > >> > underbraces being shifted to the right by maybe 15mm or so. >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > The problem is sporadic---it appears sometimes, but on the next >>> >> > >> > compile may well have disappeared. The document I am currently >>> >> > >> > working >>> >> > >> > on contains several hundred pages. I can try to put together a >>> >> > >> > minimal >>> >> > >> > example...but that may be of limited use since it may be >>> >> > >> > difficult to >>> >> > >> > get the problem to show itself when I want it to show itself. >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > So, before I do that, might anyone have an idea of what might be >>> >> > >> > the problem? >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > There is a screen capture of a shift. The right underbrace has >>> >> > >> > been >>> >> > >> > shifted far to the right. It should be like the underbrace on the >>> >> > >> > left. >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > Here is my current underbrace macro: >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > \newcommand{\mcom}[3][c]{\ensuremath{% >>> >> > >> > \begin{array}[t]{#1}% >>> >> > >> > \underbrace{#2}\\% >>> >> > >> > \text{\addfontfeatures{Color=mcom}\scriptsize{#3}}% >>> >> > >> > \end{array}% >>> >> > >> > }}% >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > The color mcom is simply defined liked this: >>> >> > >> > \definecolor{mcom} {cmyk}{0,0,0,1} >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > The \mcom macro can be used something like this: >>> >> > >> > \[ \mcom{\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1}{this is a trig. identity} \] >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > I am compiling with XeLaTeX from a TeXlive distribution. >>> >> > >> > Any ideas? >>> >> > >> > Many thanks in advance, >>> >> > >> > Dan >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> -------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > >> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >>> >> > >> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > -------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >>> >> > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >>> >> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------------------- >>> > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >>> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
