2013/3/30 Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Peter Dyballa wrote: >> When the missing characters are obviously Latin, why aren't they >> taken from a Latin script, from \englishfont for example?
I use the Rachana font as well, and while the font contains Latin letters for A-Z/a-z (and only those; no more), it may be programmed in such a way that those glyphs aren’t accessible when passing the [mlym] script tag. I don’t believe this a bug. Font’s just not designed to be used with Latin Script. -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
