On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:27:10 +0100 Martin Sourada <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:54:32 +0100 > Christoph Wickert wrote: ...snip... > > Here is my suggestion: > > F17: Probably not. > *cough-cough* What about the xfce-4.10 repo? I will probibly update that... > > F18: Lets deliver it as a 0-day update, to minimize the change of > > the user experience. Otherwise we'll have to support Thunar 1.4 > > till the F18 EOL and by that time, 1.8 will probably be out already. > Seems sane to me to do the 0-day update, definitely better than having > to support 1.4 till F18 EOL ourselves. I don't like the idea. If we are going to push it in, we should do so now before final freeze. Waiting and making it a 0 day means we get less testing before final to fix anything. > I'm going to test it myself to see how big the changes in UI are, then > I'll be able to give better feedback, but if it's mostly bugfixes and > couple of *new* functionality, but not breaking the old behaviour, I > would maybe support the idea of having it in F17 as well. I've not tested it either yet, but I don't think f17 will be viable. It's still on 4.8 and exo is depended on by a lot of things. I do think we should push to f18 asap tho. ;) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
