Am Montag, den 03.12.2012, 22:27 +0100 schrieb Martin Sourada: > Hi, > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:54:32 +0100 > Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 03.12.2012, 10:37 -0200 schrieb Sergio: > > > Please, take my boldness lightly but I'm already expecting > > > http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-December/031768.html > > > http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-December/031769.html > > > appear in updates-testing ;-) > > > > Two remarks: > > 1. Please don't *expect* something unless you do it yourself. > > 2. I am not the new version will hit F17. It's a change of the > > user experience that violates our update policy [1] and it missed > > beta freeze, so I am not even sure we could bring it to F18. > Yeah, and still firfox gets updated mid release whenever new major > release is out (I wonder when it last broke gxine build, not to > mention it actually working :()...
I agree the Firefox development model and versioning scheme is broken, but that doesn't mean that we have to break other stuff, too. ;) > > Here is my suggestion: > > F17: Probably not. > *cough-cough* What about the xfce-4.10 repo? As it isn't an official repo anyway, the update policy does not apply. > > F18: Lets deliver it as a 0-day update, to minimize the change of the > > user experience. Otherwise we'll have to support Thunar 1.4 till the > > F18 EOL and by that time, 1.8 will probably be out already. > Seems sane to me to do the 0-day update, definitely better than having > to support 1.4 till F18 EOL ourselves. Right. Note that this always is a problem, the Xfce and Fedora development cycles don't go together well and we either have to ship a development version at the beginning or support an outdated one later. :( 1.6 should buy us some time here. Kind regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
