On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:36 am, Christian Convey wrote:
> XFree86 Version 4.3.0

CVS?  Mine says 4.3.0.1.  "Release date: 9 May 2003; Build date: 07 June 2003"

(By the way, why is there a leading zero on the build date and not the release 
date?)

> (WW) Option "XkbCompat" requires an string value
> (WW) Option "XkbOptions" requires an string value

>From your XF86Config-4:

>    Option "XkbCompat" ""
>    Option "XkbOptions" ""

Why do you have these lines?

> (WW) VESA(0): Bad V_BIOS checksum

I wonder if this is causing us problems.

> *Mode: 112 (640x480)
> *Mode: 115 (800x600)
> *Mode: 118 (1024x768)

These three modes (all 32bpp) will fit on your screen.  Alas, VESA doesn't 
define a 1440x900 mode... unless I'm mistaken, it doesn't do hardware 
acceleration, either.

>From XF86Config-4:

> Modeline "1440x900" 106.47 1440 1520 1672 1904 900 901 904 932 -HSync +Vsync

VESA doesn't use modelines.

> (II) VESA(0): Not using mode "1440x900" (no mode of this name)

See? :^)

> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x1024" (width too large for \
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x768" (width too large for \
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "800x600" (width too large for \
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "640x480" (width too large for \
> virtual size)

640?  Too wide!?

>From XF86Config-4:

> Subsection "Display"
>     Depth 24
>     Modes "1440x900"  #"1280x960" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
> EndSubsection

1440x900 fails since there's no matching VESA mode.  Then XFree86 appears to 
fall back on its no-Modes-list heuristic, that is, find the biggest usable 
mode.  At least, that's what I think it does---I don't rely on it.  Could 
someone confirm/correct?  But why doesn't it try the 320x VESA modes?  Mode 
10f would have worked, I think...

> (EE) VESA(0): No valid modes
> (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.

The end.

Does nVidia's proprietary driver work?  You said that XFree86's nv driver 
looks good but futzes up the bottom row of text on your screen.  Is it an 
80x25 screen?  What's the character size in pixels?  9x16?  What happens if 
you set a smaller font?  Have you tried SVGATextMode?  fbcon?

If these questions have been asked before, forgive me.  I'm tired.

-- 
Andy Goth  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://ioioio.net/
Engineers love to change things.


_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Reply via email to