>Brian, >I completely trust what ever your decision will be. >Ron Brian, Thanks for your great job. I agree with Ron, but I have one doubt about:
>We should start a separate thread on the >ADS_REQUIRE_VERSION issue; Viktor has replaced it with a better >#define as part of his "auto-detecting" the installed version >of ACE--his proposal is that developers always have a real >installation of the aceapi, and the (x)Harbour build will look >there for headers and to determine dll versions and even create >ace32.lib for Borland users. I, for example: have ADS 9.0 installed in my machine for tests pourposes, but I always compile RDDADS with ADS_REQUIRE_VERSION=7 because all my custommers have ADS 7. So IMO autodetec is not a good idea. Thabks again and best regards, Toninho. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
