-----Messaggio Originale----- 
Da: "Ron Pinkas" <ron.pin...@xharbour.com>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it>; "xHarbour 
Developers Mailing List" <xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Data invio: sabato 24 luglio 2010 21.37
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Preprocessor bug?


> Enrico,
>
> This is NOT a bug, and it's 100% Clipper compatible. This can be corrected 
> to work like this:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> #command TEST <right: RIGHT> [<pad>]]                                  ;
>              [COLOR <nClrFore> [,<nClrBack>]]                          ;
>                                                                        ;
>      => Test( <.right.>, <pad>, <nClrFore>, <nClrBack> )
>
> FUNCTION MAIN()
>
>    TEST COLOR 1, 2 RIGHT 10  // first syntax
>    TEST RIGHT 10 COLOR 1, 2  // second syntax
>
>    RETURN NIL

Sorry, I can't see any difference between my sample and your corrected 
version above.

> The problem is the Clipper PP does NOT consider RESTRICTED MATCH MARKER a 
> STOPPER when skipping over OPTIONAL input. I'm sorry that I don't have a 
> more descriptive explanation as this is very technical. If you tried to 
> develop a Clipper compatible Pre-Processor it would become crystal clear.

Ok, I believe you. But if there is a workaround I would like to know it, 
thank you.

EMG

--
EMAG Software Homepage:     http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
The Best of Spectrum Games: http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
The EMG Music page:         http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to