Possibly another way to think about this is to split Xindice into two modules, core and standalone. The goal of core would be to supply a very high quality native xml database with very little baggage, that could be cleanly be embedded into servers such as Tomcat, Avalon, Cocoon or JBoss. The goal of standalone would be to be a light weight server that embedded the core to provide a reasonable set of standalone services. This would allow the best of both.
- joel Kurt Ward wrote: > Concerning keeping the server as a stand-alone, I would have to say > definitely a stand-alone server. Not only community/user base will be much > smaller if it is not, but there are more ways to use the server in this > setup > than there are tied to something else (that might not be needed at all). > > Kurt > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
begin:vcard n:Rosi-Schwartz;Joel tel;fax:+44 1435 831011 tel;home:+44 1435 831010 tel;work:+44 1435 831010 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Techne Research Limited version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Architect adr;quoted-printable:;;Downgate Farmhouse=0D=0AFurnace Lane;Warbleton near Heathfield;East Sussex;TN21 9AZ;United Kingdom fn:Joel Rosi-Schwartz end:vcard
