I thought Xindice only enforced unique document identifiers at the collection level. What's to stop someone from adding the same document uuid to another collection?
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: replication > > That sounds like something similar to what I'm working on: combining > Xindice > with JXTA. The idea is to make a peer-to-peer XML database. > > For my application, globally unique identifiers for documents are URIs. > That allows me to use URNs like urn:oid:1.3.1.6.7566... for an > OID-identified document or urn:uuid:7e1f1218ab800128... for a > UUID-identified document. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday 12 June 2002 10.52 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: replication > > > > > > I am not sure if anyone has thought about replication for Xindice, but I > > can certainly see some applications for it. One of the first issues for > > dealing with replication is obtaining a globablly unique identifier for > > each document in the database. As far as I can tell, this can be simply > > done by concatenating the unique identifier of the document in a > > collection with the unique identifier of the collection in the database. > > Is this correct? > > > > -Matt > >
