That is not a bad idea. Did you layer the JMS client for Xindice on top
of its Java API or did you make an actual JMS API for Xindice?

-Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark J. Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: replication
> 
> I have been approaching the problem slightly differently.   Rather
> than have my clients talk to Xindice directly, I have an intermediate
> Server.  All of my clients are JMS clients, my "Xindice" server is
> also a JMS client.   My clients subscribe to "documents".   My
> plan for replication is to have another "JMS Client/Server" also
> subscribe.   It listens for changes and updates Xindice silently
> in the background.   If one dies, it steps up and takes over.
> 
> Mark
> 
> Matt Liotta wrote:
> 
> > ic, I am currently generating globally unique identifiers for all
> > documents no matter what collection they are in. This would of
course
> > all my application to make use of replication without fear of
documents
> > in different collections colliding. However, this wouldn't work for
all
> > applications, which is why I was suggesting the concatenation of the
> > collection identifier with the document identifier.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sean Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:34 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: replication
> > >
> > > > I thought Xindice only enforced unique document identifiers at
the
> > > > collection level. What's to stop someone from adding the same
> > document
> > > > uuid to another collection?
> > >
> > > Nothing.
> > >
> > > By virtue of joining the same peergroup, peers agree that the same
ID
> > for
> > > a
> > > document means the same document.  If two peers want the same ID
to
> > refer
> > > to
> > > different documents, they must belong to different peergroups.
> > >
> > > In other words, it's up to the peergroup to provide an ID policy
and
> > > mechanism.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean Kelly
> > > Independent Consultant
> > > http://kelly.homeunix.com/
> 
> --
> Mark J Stang
> Architect
> Cybershop Systems


Reply via email to