> That wasn't my point. What I wanted to say was "let's find a *stable* 
> format for the XML configuration file and let's have a *first* rough 
> implementation of the RPC interface that reads that.

That's exactly what happend to the system.xml file: first define the file
format and then (maybe) later read it.  I do not like this approach but it's
personal.

> Cool, are we really ready to tackle this now? I'm absolutely +1 to this, 
> I think that security, and basic authentication, is a major issue as of 
> now. I'm starting to wonder about a 1.1 release maybe postponed but with 
> metadata and basic AAA in... I'd love that! :-)

thank you for volunteering :-)

But feel free to implement the xml-rpc configuration file (I don't use
XML-RPC so I don't care).  We will see once the security is implemented if
the format has changed.  It will be a good experiment for everyone.

-Vladimir

=====
Vladimir R. Bossicard
Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Reply via email to