Vladimir R. Bossicard wrote:
i vote for 1.3 also ( same reason ) , so if consensus is reached on using 1.3, is it necessary to use Forehead to start up the jetty server? It looks like the cocoon developers have moved away from using Forehead also ( they're now using their own custom Loader class ).BUT, that's just me. Everyone else? I'm afraid some people might be
stuck on older vm(s) based on corporate policy or platform...Speak up
everyone!
Exactly... => JVM 1.3
-Vladimir
Since this is a design/distribution question, I'll leave it up to the more active amongst you to help guide me.
The thoughts that I had :
1) Get rid of forehead entirely and move to straight jetty. The upside is that it works in all VM situations, the downside is that there's less scriptability for those in MS environments ( though I don't feel we have the script requirements that cocoon might )
2) Bring over the Loader class from Cocoon and port the scripts over to do that. Upside is that you still get the script configurability of the forehead tool. Downside is that it's new to the environment and obviously does require some rework.
Of course, I'll wait till consensus is reached.
Thanks in advance, -a
