Users of the embedded version may care more about this choice. As for me, stuck on 1.3 for now due to reasons beyond my control. So, I request JVM >= 1.3. -Terry Kevin Ross wrote: My vote, 1.4+ BUT, that's just me. Everyone else? I'm afraid some people might be stuck on older vm(s) based on corporate policy or platform...Speak up everyone!-Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Mailing Lists (Aadi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: minimum jvm requirements for xindice 1.1? one of the problems i'm trying to work out right now is fixing the start scripts ( xindice.bat/xindice.sh ) and I just switched today to a 1.4.1 vm and the script all of a sudden worked. Switching back to the 1.3.1 VM gave me the same NumberFormatException as before. If Xindice is going to 1.4+ only, then this isn't a problem, but if goal is to be able to run under 1.3, then i will gladly continue the search for a solution. Thanks in advance, -a |
- minimum jvm requirements for xindice 1.1? Mailing Lists (Aadi)
- RE: minimum jvm requirements for xindice 1.1? Kevin Ross
- RE: minimum jvm requirements for xindice 1.... Vladimir R. Bossicard
- Re: minimum jvm requirements for xindic... Mailing Lists (Aadi)
- Re: minimum jvm requirements for xi... Gianugo Rabellino
- RE: minimum jvm requirements f... Kevin Ross
- Re: minimum jvm requiremen... Gianugo Rabellino
- Re: minimum jvm requir... Mailing Lists (Aadi)
- Re: minimum jvm requirements for xindice 1.... Murray Altheim
- Terry Rosenbaum