Re: Which version of 1.1b is stable enough for develoment

[Joel Rosi-Schwartz]

Kevin O'Neill wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:06:35 +0100, Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:

  

Hi,

I am finally trying to migrate from 1.0 to 1.1b.  I have pulled down the
Head, build build-20030627 and build-1_1_b2  from cvs.  All three build
without issue. Which of these is considered stable enough for application
development?
    

What driver do you intend using? I'm using the managed driver inside of
belts with no real issues (once you apply the patches I posted yesterday).
  

Yes, I am planning on using the managed driver that you contribute, it fits my needs exactly. I supposing that you are saying here that you are using cvs Head, is that accurate?

I have a concern that I can not run 'build.sh test-build' on any of the
three. What I get is a complaint from ant that it can not create task
junit and the standard ant message saying that it a jar is probably
missing. The classpath printed at startup clearly shows that all three
junit jars are on it. Is this a known problem or do I have a configuration
problem?
  

Are you using an RPM based ant (like the one from jpackage)? 
  

No, apache-ant-1.5.3-1-bin.tar.gz, but this seems to be irrelevant since Xindice packages its own ant and build.sh points to using it in.

I am running Linux with Java 4.1.1.

I'm guessing that's 1.4.1 :)

Ah, now  I am in trouble for letting that our and everyone will want a copy of it too ;-)

- joel