On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote: > >> The one that is treated by the second scipt found in "filters.in.tab" is > >> never rejected on the RH9... On RH7, no problem. > > DL> I tested on RH8 and RH9. No problems at all. You still didn't describe me > DL> the exact procedure you used to state that it failed. > > My test filters go like this : > > The first (FilterA.sh) one returns 6 if @@FROM="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and > the second one ((FilterB.sh)) returns 6 if @@FROM="[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > >From an external ISP's smtp server, using my MUA, I send a mail to one > of the mailbox on the Linux RH9 machine where Xmail runs with my 2 > filters in "filters.in.tab" like this : > > "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "FilterA.tab" > "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "FilterB.tab" > > I send a first mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail is rejected. > Correct. > > I send a second mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail is not rejected. > Not correct. Eventhough the log shows the second filter as detected > the banned @@FROM and the script returned 6.
When you say that the message has not been rejected, are you actually receiving the message on the target mailbox or you're just looking at log files ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
