Hi,
DL> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote: >> >> The one that is treated by the second scipt found in "filters.in.tab" is >> >> never rejected on the RH9... On RH7, no problem. >> >> DL> I tested on RH8 and RH9. No problems at all. You still didn't describe me >> DL> the exact procedure you used to state that it failed. >> >> My test filters go like this : >> >> The first (FilterA.sh) one returns 6 if @@FROM="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and >> the second one ((FilterB.sh)) returns 6 if @@FROM="[EMAIL PROTECTED]". >> >> >From an external ISP's smtp server, using my MUA, I send a mail to one >> of the mailbox on the Linux RH9 machine where Xmail runs with my 2 >> filters in "filters.in.tab" like this : >> >> "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "FilterA.tab" >> "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "FilterB.tab" >> >> I send a first mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail is rejected. >> Correct. >> >> I send a second mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail is not rejected. >> Not correct. Eventhough the log shows the second filter as detected >> the banned @@FROM and the script returned 6. DL> When you say that the message has not been rejected, are you actually DL> receiving the message on the target mailbox Yes. DL> or you're just looking at log Both. -- Fil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
