Well, I think that ideal situation would be if a mail sent to mail list
should go through IN filters just once (for first local mail in mail list)
and not for every local delivery. Also it  would be great if a message would
go through OUT filter just once and not for all NONLOCAL mail addresses.

I don't know if that can be programed in Xmail, that's up to Davide to say.

Matic

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 5:54 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter logics


> At 11:46 3/24/2004, Francesco Vertova wrote:
> >I agree that generally AV
> >scanning should be the destination server's business
> I don't agree with this at all. I think that AV scanning should be
> performed on all outbound mail. Of course, I think that customers should
> also have their outbound port 25 traffic redirected to the network's
> primary MSA, unless they have contracted otherwise (and agreed to be
> responsible for doing their own checks on outbound mail).
>
> These two steps would reduce the amount of virus traffic on the net
> *signficantly*. (Similar methods could also be used to reduce spam
traffic,
> by instituting a spam check on outbound mail.)
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to