Francesco Vertova wrote: >>I'm having a second thought about this. Maybe messages to mailing lists >>shouldn't be scanned, since they will be trapped later on by either IO or >>OUT filters. Uhmmm ... > > Oh, they should: if virus found the message is trashed once for all with no > need to repeat the scan for each ML user. Also, without ML scanning I > should enable filter.out scanning to prevent a viral message to a local ML > from being propagated to all non-local members. I agree that generally AV > scanning should be the destination server's business, but i don't like > viruses to spread and eat up bandwidth through a ML of mine ... > > If you feel like revising the filter logic, maybe adding a 'global' (SMTP?) > filtering layer might be worthwhile, so that, e.g., a viral message is > scanned and blocked only once, and a clean message is not scanned for > viruses again and again. As per a previous thread ...
I agree with this! This way the virus will be killed asap. -- Groeten, Peter Ever stop to think, and forget to start again? - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 28 days, 20 hours and 2 minutes, 0 users logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
