And would you have the bounce say: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox full Or 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox full
My thinking is that it should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the original rcpt to), but I can see why you might do otherwise. Does this occur between two users on the same domain? Ie. Is it a problem between users of the same Xmail server, or between domains on the same Xmail server only. Rob :-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shiloh Jennings Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 7:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [xmail] quota bug in forwarding I have found a situation with XMail where XMail ignores the mailbox quotas. If there are two mailboxes on the same box and one forwards into the other, XMail ignores the mailbox quota of the second mailbox when receiving forwards from the first one. For example, lets say we have two mailboxes called [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] If these are one the same machine and [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will get delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] even if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is significantly over its mailbox quota. The expectation is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] will bounce the email when [EMAIL PROTECTED] is over quota. I can see why we would not want [EMAIL PROTECTED] to bounce back to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because that would just generate a loop. I would like to see the email bounce back to the original sender when this situation occurs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
