> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
>
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your*
> > > problems
> > > with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized
> > > object to be pre-initialized with zero.
> > > Please do not post those kind of patches anymore.
> > >
> > MSVC2005 is indeed not 100% C99 compliant. It's still living with one
> > leg in the C89 era: I'll have to live with that.
>
> Hmmm, I made quite a few XMail releases (and built a lot more at work)
> with MSVC2005, with zero problems. I don't think Microsoft can screw up
> the standard *that* bad. It must be something else.
>
I was looking up the option of GCC, that sets the standard, just
today and according to the GCC manuals it using GNU89 as default:
`gnu89'
Default, ISO C90 plus GNU extensions (including some C99
features).
Unfortunately it's not documented, what those C99 featues are.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
