On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > > > > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* > > > > problems > > > > with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized > > > > object to be pre-initialized with zero. > > > > Please do not post those kind of patches anymore. > > > > > > > MSVC2005 is indeed not 100% C99 compliant. It's still living with one > > > leg in the C89 era: I'll have to live with that. > > > > Hmmm, I made quite a few XMail releases (and built a lot more at work) > > with MSVC2005, with zero problems. I don't think Microsoft can screw up > > the standard *that* bad. It must be something else. > > > I was looking up the option of GCC, that sets the standard, just > today and according to the GCC manuals it using GNU89 as default: > > `gnu89' > Default, ISO C90 plus GNU extensions (including some C99 > features). > > Unfortunately it's not documented, what those C99 featues are.
That has been true by forever basically. Every C compiler I used, and I used many of them, did it. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
