On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:59:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I attached a first sketch for an adopt function. It tries the "oldNs"
forgot the attachment I think :-) > approach. It does not unlink the brach yet; I don't know if it should, or > rather expect the branch to be unlinked already. The function is not tested, > so just comments on its semantics please ;-) > > I have the feeling that someone might object an addition to the code-base, > which clearly leaves room for handling namespaces differently. So maybe this > all ends up in a intermediate C layer for me; there won't be room for a "DOM > wrapper helper" C file, will it? I won't object, unless it penalizes the comon case. For example if it forces the use of an expensive callbck on each processed node, which would just be an implementation mistake, not a principle error. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
