Hi, On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 16:52 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > > Is slowly boils down to using just the xmlReconciliateNs mechanism > > to declare all missing ns-declarations on the given node, as Daniel > > first suggested - although you have been warned ;-) > > I'm not the one this API is designed for, so I will refrain from > getting in the choices unless I see something which would be too > dangerous to put in the API. I'm happy to see the 3 main consumers > of that API firmly discussing the options and fully understanding > the scope of the problem. You just need to not forgot ID/REF in the
Ah, right ID/IDREF: maybe we need an additional traversal before any attempt to adopt can be done; so reject the node if this constraint is violated. Would be a mess to stop somewhere in the branch. Any ideas here? > picture. And I will check code sanity too :-). I'm off but not far > away :-) > > Daniel > Good to hear! Regards, Kasimier _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
