Hi Mark,
tahnks for responding.
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:05 -0700, Mark Vakoc wrote:
>
> --- Stefan Kost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hi again,
> >
> > Or other way around has anyone sucessfully used those function with
> > xsltproc?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Can anyone point me to an example as a proof of concept?
>
> xsltproc --dumpextensions
$ xsltproc --dumpextensions | grep strings
{http://exslt.org/strings}concat
{http://exslt.org/strings}tokenize
{http://exslt.org/strings}encode-uri
{http://exslt.org/strings}padding
{http://exslt.org/strings}split
{http://exslt.org/strings}decode-uri
{http://exslt.org/strings}align
so it seems to be available. Thus I dropped the include with the custom
implementation.
>
> > >> What makes you think so? From the log you posted:
> > >> | Registering extension prefix str : http://exslt.org/Strings
>
> You could always spell the namespace correctly.
That came from the inlcude. I named it
xmlns:str="http://exstl.org/strings";
unfortunately still no success here :(
Resolving attribute sets references
xmlXPathCompOpEval: function split not found
XPath error : Unregistered function
xmlXPathCompiledEval: 1 object left on the stack
Stefan
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
