On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So I'm just repeating my question in case it went out of focus: > Does anyone see problems wrt adding a public wrapper for > xmlStaticCopyNode() which also takes a @parent argument?
Fine in principle. In practice, it's one more entry point in the API, will the people who need it find it ? But sure, go ahead ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
