Daniel Veillard said (on IRC, though not on this mailing list) that he's
waiting for feedback about how to fix this issue.
I for myself have to say I'd remove it completely; I do not think it is
reasonable to have the document altered by the parser in first place;
I've found some more issues with it in the mailing list, too.
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2002-October/msg00047.html)
Since DV didn't ask himself -- it is after all me who wants this bug
fixed -- I have to ask: what do all of you think about it? Any
suggestions how it should be resolved?
-- iSteve
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
