On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:00:45AM -0700, Rush Manbert wrote:
> I thought that "const xmlNodePtr node" meant the same
> thing as "const xmlNode * node", as if xmlNodePtr were a macro
> definition that expanded to "xmlNode *", but the typedef changes things,
Right. You caught the point: macros and typedefs are different
things.
I think this is one of the less documented things of C/C++.
> You are correct and I have learned something.
Happy to be useful.
> If what you are asking for is the
> intent, then Daniel will need to answer.
I agree: waiting Daniel for a authentic interpretation.
massimo morara
--
"The glass is neither half empty nor half full. It is twice as large as
it needs to be."
-- unknown
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
