massimo morara wrote: > Right. You caught the point: macros and typedefs are different > things. > I think this is one of the less documented things of C/C++.
massimo morara wrote: > In the function xmlCopyNode(const xmlNodePtr node, int > extended) [tree.c], what is supposed be 'const'? > > The pointer 'node' or the struct pointed by 'node'? Beside the effects for the compiler this should be read as: The "node" argument to xmlCopyNode function is guaranteed not not to be modified by this function (no side effects). Cheers, Andy -- FELA Management AG Phone :+41-52-646 46 55 Basadingerstrasse 18 Fax :+41-52-646 46 96 CH-8253 Diessenhofen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fela.ch/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
