Vojtech Fried, 26.07.2012 18:17:
> Third version of the timsort patch. Unfortunately, I was not able to
> finish it. It does not link on windows and I didn't test it in any way.
> But if anyone wants to try it, it is probably not far away... I moved
> the code to .c file and had to do some other shuffling.

Hmm, it doesn't apply cleanly for me against 2.8.0 (so I guess you took it
from the latest git master, which is the right thing to do). The only
problem seems to be with the win32 setup, though, so I think I can safely
ignore it.

But once applied, it also doesn't build. The definition of the
xmlNodeTimSort() function is missing.

I tried your second patch and it works for me. Seeing how much more
involved the third version of the patch is, I wonder if it's really all
that bad to leave the timsort implementation in a header file. After all,
it's supposed to be an externally maintained piece of code, and in the
external repo, it lives in a header file. So it would reduce the
maintenance overhead if it was just copied over unchanged.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to