On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:51:31PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > >>Makefile:949: recipe for target `gen_prog' failed > >> > >>Before that, there is: > >> > >>Found 1607 functions in libxml2-api.xml > >>Found 55 functions in libxml2-python-api.xml > >>Generated 889 wrapper functions, 557 failed, 216 skipped > > > > Humpf, thanks for the report. Daniel, would you mind looking at this ? > > (Please Cc: me if you'd like me to jump into a thread, otherwise > it's all too easy to miss a nudge like this!)
yeah, sorry, I forgot ! > Can't reproduce here. It's not a Python-version thing; I can run > generator.py just fine with 2.4.4. > > (To Michael Ludwig: You didn't see a stack trace or anything? Could > you poke around generator.py to see why it's returning non-zero?) > > Is there a reason why libxml2-py.c doesn't go into the distribution > tarball? (It's specified as nodist_libxml2mod_la_SOURCES in > python/Makefile.am.) I didn't address this earlier, but if the dist > were to bundle everything in $(GENERATED)---and I don't see a reason > why not--- end users who download a tarball wouldn't have to > generate files at all, and this kind of problem wouldn't come up in > the first place. I'm fine adding it to the tarball if people think it's better for portability ! > I'd be happy to provide a patch, but the "nodist" question needs > answering first... To be honnest I don't remember why it ended up that way, maybe because since it's generated and was looking eas to regenerate once people have Python installed, I didn't looked further. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
