pikaiyuan wrote: > Marcel Ruff,hello！ pikaiyuan,Hello!
> > Yes,i had changed it to "_int64 ll=0", and it is ok now. > Is there any problem in my changes? No, but i will change it here to 'Timestamp' to be portable as _int64 is an invention of Microsoft. best regards Marcel > > thanks again > > ======= 2004-04-28 18:33:14 has been wrote：======= > > >>pikaiyuan wrote: >> >>>Hello,every one >>> >>> I got a error when i compile the xmlblaster cpp client lib >>>in windows2000 with msvc7. The message is: >>>"D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) : >>> error C2632: 'long' followed by 'long' is illegal >>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) : >>> error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number' >>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) : >>> error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'L' >>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) : >>> error C2065: 'L' : undeclared identifier" >>> I traced into src code and got the error position is "long long ll=0LL;" >>> >>>any suggestion? >>> >>>thanks any way >>> >>> >>> pikaiyuan >>> 2004-04-28 >>> >>> >> >>Try instead: >> >>long long int ll=0LL; >> >>__int64 ll=0LL; >> >>Timestamp ll=0LL; // See our util/xmlBlasterDef.h >> >>With standard C99 there is a portable 'int64_t' >>in stdint.h, but Windows does not support this >>so try the other variants. >> >>Please report which variants work, >> >>thanks, >> >>Marcel >> >> >>-- >>http://www.xmlBlaster.org >> >>. > > > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = > > > > > > pikaiyuan > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2004-04-28 > > -- http://www.xmlBlaster.org
