Marcel Ruff,hello！
ok, i had used 'Timestamp' as 'Timestamp ll=0L;' just now, and it works,
thanks.
======= 2004-04-28 20:38:42 has been wrote：=======
>pikaiyuan wrote:
>> Marcel Ruff,hello！
>
>pikaiyuan,Hello!
>
>>
>> Yes,i had changed it to "_int64 ll=0", and it is ok now.
>> Is there any problem in my changes?
>No, but i will change it here to 'Timestamp' to be portable as
>_int64 is an invention of Microsoft.
>
>best regards
>
>Marcel
>>
>> thanks again
>>
>> ======= 2004-04-28 18:33:14 has been wrote：=======
>>
>>
>>>pikaiyuan wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello,every one
>>>>
>>>> I got a error when i compile the xmlblaster cpp client lib
>>>>in windows2000 with msvc7. The message is:
>>>>"D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) :
>>>> error C2632: 'long' followed by 'long' is illegal
>>>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) :
>>>> error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'
>>>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) :
>>>> error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'L'
>>>>D:\drivers\xmlBlaster_0_9\build.tmp\src\c++\util\qos\ClientProperty.h(216) :
>>>> error C2065: 'L' : undeclared identifier"
>>>> I traced into src code and got the error position is "long long ll=0LL;"
>>>>
>>>>any suggestion?
>>>>
>>>>thanks any way
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pikaiyuan
>>>> 2004-04-28
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Try instead:
>>>
>>>long long int ll=0LL;
>>>
>>>__int64 ll=0LL;
>>>
>>>Timestamp ll=0LL; // See our util/xmlBlasterDef.h
>>>
>>>With standard C99 there is a portable 'int64_t'
>>>in stdint.h, but Windows does not support this
>>>so try the other variants.
>>>
>>>Please report which variants work,
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>
>>>Marcel
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>http://www.xmlBlaster.org
>>>
>>>.
>>
>>
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> pikaiyuan
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 2004-04-28
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>http://www.xmlBlaster.org
>
>.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
pikaiyuan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-04-28
