I have to disagree. I feel getting feedback from the user community is more
valuable than
just a research group. "Real life" implementations fully exploit the limits of
any product.
Brad Berendt
Sterling Commerce
District Consulting Mgr - E-Commerce Solutions Microsoft
Managed Services Division
Office: 614-791-5782 Fax: 614-793-7045
Rita Parrott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/01/2000 02:20:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (bcc: Brad
Berendt/Dublin-ISG)
Subject: RE: Mercator
Greetings to everyone:
This is the first time that I have ever responded to this list. The
reason I am choosing to do so now is to state that we should not fill up the
emails with testimonials about certain products. Does anyone know if the
Gartner group or another objective organization has evaluated and published
results?
Thanks and regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Beecher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Mercator
Not at all -
Mercator is the fastest tool, hands down.
If you don't use it correctly, you can create unoptimized situations. The
strength of the tool is that it is so flexable, you can choose the most
optimized method of acheiving your objective.
What Mercator is doing is creating an extract file. Then it rips through
this extract file to transform it to your output. Most likely you should
pay attention to optimizing the query that creates the extracted data. Also
if you are using ODBC, you might see a performance increase by using
Mercator's native db driver for your database instead of ODBC.
Anthony Beecher
-----Original Message-----
From: Eugene Teo [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mercator
I notice some of you have used Mercator before. My office uses Mercator for
our
customers but found that it runs too slowly. This is particularly true when
the
database is huge.
One reason for this, IMHO, is because Mercator loads the whole database
into
their own temporary files before starting the mapping process. This is
one of
the few reasons I found.
Anybody shares this same sentiment?
-Eugene
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org <http://www.XMLedi-Group.org>
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
<http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm>
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
