At Wednesday, 30 January 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote <snipped>: >While I can appreciate your championing to the cause and asking us >"lurkers" to show ourselves, I feel that asking if RELAX NG as a >perspective W3C XML Schema alternative/replacement is going "out on a limb" >- much further than we are willing to go.
Hmmm, I had not thought that asking people to share what they were hearing from folks would be asking them to "go out on a limb". Oh well... >The W3C is the most logical body to hold this universally defined >schema. You seem to be saying that the W3C stamp of approval is somewhat important, which is what I'm hearing from folks. I agree with your other comments, and have the same concerns. ------------------ Michael C. Rawlins www.rawlinsecconsulting.com =================================================================== Texas Metronet =================================================================== ------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------ Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leave the subject and body of the message blank Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To receive only one message per day (digest format) send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], (leave the subject line blank) digest xmledi-group your-email-address To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at: http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
