Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> When I investigated the documents from the various revisions, none of them
> had structural problems regarding captions. However, in
> the versions prior to v1.11 there were structural errors in the bookinfo
> element. I've since then given very strict instructions and
> my writers know that they may not check in any invalid documents into cvs.
First of all, #PCDATA was added to the content model of
caption in 4.3.
Therefore, in a DocBook *4.2* document, a caption should be indented
like this:
---
<caption>
<para>Component view of the Sectra Cardiology Package and its
interaction with IDS5</para>
</caption>
---
* This is the case in <section id="_Toc95720492"> of V1.8:
---
<mediaobject>
<imageobject>
<imagedata
fileref="images/installation_guide_angio_cardio-component_view.png"
format="PNG" />
</imageobject>
<caption>
<para>Component view of the Sectra Cardiology Package and its
interaction with IDS5</para>
</caption>
</mediaobject>
---
* This is *not* the case in <section id="_Toc95720492"> of V1.9:
---
<mediaobject>
<imageobject>
<imagedata
fileref="images/installation_guide_angio_cardio-component_view.png"
format="PNG" />
</imageobject>
<caption><para>Component view of the Sectra Cardiology Package
and its
interaction with IDS5</para></caption>
</mediaobject>
---
* Possible explanation #1: In V1.9, an xi:include was added at the
beginning of <chapter id="_Toc95720491">
--
<xi:include href="../user_guide/introduction/indications_for_use.xml"
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; />
--
and "indications_for_use.xml" is invalid.
* Possible explanation #2: Someone in your organization have modified
your system-wide XML catalog to make
"-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" point to a *V4.3* DTD (!!!).
---
PS: I don't think there is a bug related to this in XXE.
