Hi, What you say is that applying 4.3 DTD on a 4.2 document is bad? Can this be the problem? Should I change all DOCTYPEs to 4.3?
Best regards, /Kenneth -------------------------------------------------------- Kenneth Johansson Technical Documentation Manager Sectra Imtec AB Teknikringen 20 E-mail: ke-joh AT sectra DOT se SE-583 30 Link?ping Phone: +46 13 23 52 00 SWEDEN Web: http://www.sectra.se > -----Original Message----- > From: Hussein Shafie [mailto:hussein at pixware.fr] > Sent: den 27 maj 2005 12:50 > To: Kenneth Johansson > Cc: xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com > Subject: Re: [XXE] Strange indention > > Kenneth Johansson wrote: > > When I investigated the documents from the various > revisions, none of > > them had structural problems regarding captions. However, in the > > versions prior to v1.11 there were structural errors in the > bookinfo element. I've since then given very strict > instructions and my writers know that they may not check in > any invalid documents into cvs. > > First of all, #PCDATA was added to the content model of > caption in 4.3. > > Therefore, in a DocBook *4.2* document, a caption should be > indented like this: > --- > <caption> > <para>Component view of the Sectra Cardiology > Package and its > interaction with IDS5</para> > </caption> > --- > > > > * This is the case in <section id="_Toc95720492"> of V1.8: > --- > <mediaobject> > <imageobject> > <imagedata > fileref="images/installation_guide_angio_cardio-component_view.png" > format="PNG" /> > </imageobject> > > <caption> > <para>Component view of the Sectra Cardiology > Package and its > interaction with IDS5</para> > </caption> > </mediaobject> > --- > > > > * This is *not* the case in <section id="_Toc95720492"> of V1.9: > --- > <mediaobject> > <imageobject> > <imagedata > fileref="images/installation_guide_angio_cardio-component_view.png" > format="PNG" /> > </imageobject> > > <caption><para>Component view of the Sectra > Cardiology Package > and its > interaction with IDS5</para></caption> > </mediaobject> > --- > > > > * Possible explanation #1: In V1.9, an xi:include was added at the > beginning of <chapter id="_Toc95720491"> > -- > <xi:include href="../user_guide/introduction/indications_for_use.xml" > xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; /> > -- > and "indications_for_use.xml" is invalid. > > > > * Possible explanation #2: Someone in your organization have modified > your system-wide XML catalog to make > "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" point to a *V4.3* DTD (!!!). > > > > --- > PS: I don't think there is a bug related to this in XXE. > > >
