Hi Hussein

...
> Peter Brooks wrote:
> > 
> > I was having problems (still am) in getting reliable output 
...

> Difficult to help you for this. I just doubt it could have been the
> unindented output...

I understand - it's just that everything seemed to be fine and then I
noticed the odd format. I wasn't looking so much for an indented layout as
for one that didn't start each line with a closing bracket ">" :)

> > One thing I haven't found is a way to set the baseline 
...

> If you use "FO Converter - XSL Utility" (the graphical tool):
> 
> * For generating RTF, then you really use *our* product.
> Try with Transformation dialog option "Create intermediate FO file in
> input directory instead of output directory" checked.

I tried that - but then I was careful to keep input and output files in the
same directory so that the entire process would be transportable to any part
of the network (eventually). It didn't work.

> * For generating PDF, then you in fact use OpenSource tool 
> called FOP (
> http://xml.apache.org/fop/ ), even if XSL Utility integrates it.
> The same remark about option "Create intermediate FO..." applies too.
> 
> But FOP, which we consider here as alpha quality software, 
> has also the
> following bug: a graphics file name which should be relative to the FO
> document is in fact relative to the current working directory 
> (`pwd` in
> Unix parlance).
> 
> Workaround 1: use absolute file names.
> 
> Workaround 2: start XSL Utility in the directory that will contain the
> generated FO document.

Tried that too - still didn't work.

The reason seems to be that the app is looking for a baseline directory,
which I thought I might specify as a parameter (such as XFC_HOME or
something similar), but so far no luck. It seems logical that it should be
possible to use some kind of app-specific variable to make the setting...

> We'll of course upgrade the FOP bundled with XSL Utility for the next
> release of FO Converter, may be this bug will then be fixed.

If all it needs is a path assigned to a system (or other) variable that
should be pretty straightforward (I would hope :)).

Thanks for all your help and suggestions - much appreciated. If I find a
different workaround I'll let you know.

Best wishes,

Peter

Reply via email to