Jean Jordaan wrote: >>>> I'm sorry but we consider this functionality to be marginally useful >>> Well, I've gratefully used this functionality in every other editor >>> I've used, from Word to Vim. >> Of course, "marginally useful" does not mean "useless". > > So you're saying that I'm marginal, and that no one else uses this > functionality? > > Look, it's like saying one screen should be enough for anybody. It's > not. Best practise today is for programmers to work with two or more > screens. It is better to have the relevant information in view. > Sometimes the relevant information will be in widely separated parts > of the document. >
Sorry, I didn't want to offend you. My only excuse is that I do not master your language (I'm Egyptian). My idea of "marginally useful" was: "indeed useful, but just from time to time". I didn't think about the programmer working with two screens (this is not my case). Thank you for remembering me of such common situation nowadays.
