Hi Hussein,

Unfortunately, we had to reinstall the v3.3 version, since the Courier
font seems
to be displayed differently in the new version, which was not
appreciated by our editors :(

I also discovered a very strange problem.
In the v3.3 we called Cocoon from the XMLMind app via the viewHTML
command. Worked perfectly.
In v3.6 if I call Cocoon over start with the defaultViewer I get a
permission denied error from Cocoon
(with the same document, no infrastructure changes or soever). 

best regards,
Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huditsch, Roman (LNG-VIE) 
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:14 PM
> To: 'xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com'
> Subject: RE: [XXE] XMLmind XML Editor 3.6.0 - viewHTML replacement
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just discovered the start command, which is suppossed to 
> replace the viewHTML command, I think.
> Is there a way to set the appropriate helper application in 
> the configuration file (instead of defining it in the 
> application options)?
> 
> thanks,
> Roman
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Huditsch, Roman (LNG-VIE)
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:35 AM
> > To: 'xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com'
> > Subject: [XXE] XMLmind XML Editor 3.6.0 - viewHTML replacement
> > 
> > Hi Hussein,
> > 
> > We just changed from v3.3 to v3.6 and discovered that the viewHTML 
> > command is not supported any more.
> > Is there an other way to get the same results?
> > 
> > We are now using:
> > 
> > <cfg:property
> > name="XXE_HTML_PREVIEW_COMMAND">"C:\Programme\Internet
> > Explorer\iexplore.exe" "%U"</cfg:property>
> >     <cfg:command name="show">
> >             <cfg:macro>
> >                     <cfg:sequence>
> >                             <cfg:get
> > expression="concat(substring-before(substring('%D', 4), '.xml'), 
> > '.html')"/>
> >                             <cfg:command name="viewObject" 
> > parameter="http://production.lexisnexis.at:8080/cocoon/zeitsch
> > riften/html/%_"/>
> >                     </cfg:sequence>
> >             </cfg:macro>
> >     </cfg:command>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Roman

Reply via email to