Robert Ganowski wrote: > Yes, I strongly agree with Philip. It would be en extension to the first > position of the user wish list in the section "ease of use" > (http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/wish_list.html).
Will do. > Are the points of the wish list ordered in any manner? Perhaps priority? Excerpts of the Users Wish List (http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/wish_list.html) --- This list is not sorted, that is, the rank of a feature request is not meaningful. --- Now, here's how here, at XMLmind, we use this wish list. --> It is mainly a idea tank. --> *Most* items will not be implemented because: [a] We don't like the idea behind the item (e.g. XXE as plug-in for Eclipse ;-) ) [b] The item is simply too hard to implement (e.g. XXE as plug-in for Eclipse) [c] Even when the item is not too hard to implement, we don't see a possible return on investment for it (e.g. support for Norman Walsh's Website DTD). However, it is interesting to know that users would like to have these items implemented. --> *A* *few* items are likely to be implemented (but with a low priority) because: [1] We like the idea and we, as XXE users, would like to use the feature it describes. [2] The item more or less matches an item in our secret TODO list. [3] The item is in fact a way to increase the extensibility of XXE. [4] The limitation of XXE described by the item is really a pain in the ??? for most users. [5] The item is simple and/or funny to implement. I would say that your RFE belongs to case [4] :-)
