Hello Clark and Hans,

You will not find consensus on the rightness of using a comma after “e.g.”  The 
Chicago Manual of Style says yes (section 6.43), but the Oxford Manual of Style 
says no (3.8). Despite being solidly American, I would never put a comma after 
“e.g.” in the examples below.

But then, I never write “e.g.”  At my company, we have a much simpler solution: 
never, ever use abbreviations for Latin phrases, because they are two 
translation steps removed from clarity. (Latin meaning to abbreviation to 
English meaning.)  Instead, we spell out the plain old English words for the 
meaning we want to convey: and so on for etc., that is for i.e., for example or 
such as, depending on context, for e.g.  So far, the extra few keystrokes have 
not given us repetitive stress injuries.

There was a time when Latin was the lingua franca of the educated Western 
world. That time has passed and, for better or worse, English is now the lingua 
franca.


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of arcasys
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:45 PM
To: xmleditor-support
Subject: Re: [XXE] Spell checking and abbreviations (UNCLASSIFIED)

Hi Clark,

That's certainly true for English, and I was not aware of the possibility to 
put a comma after "e.g.". Unfortunately that will solve only part of my problem 
because I write my documentation in both English and German, and comma rules 
are very different in German (and more complicated and strict as in English, 
I'm afraid). We have a lot of "z.B." with no way to put a comma behind.

Thanks anyway,
Hans

Am Freitag, den 21.09.2012, 11:49 -0400 schrieb Clark Karr:



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE



This is really a grammatical issue.  In many cases, you should put a comma 
after "e.g.".  For example, your sentence could be "In a sentence, e.g., this 
one, 'this' is reported ...".



Another example: "The political parties are at it again; e.g., the 
conservatives say "bla bla bla" and the liberals say "Bla Bla Bla".



Commas are "half stops" and indicate a slight pause when speaking.  One way of 
checking for comma placement is to say the sentence out loud and notice where 
the slight pauses occur.  A grammar book, whose title I've forgotten, suggests 
punctuation is the notation for how to "sing a sentence"; an interesting 
insight, I thought.



You may also use a colon to introduce a list; e.g.:

   - a jug of wine,

   - a loaf of bread, and

   - thou.



Clark





-----Original Message-----

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of arcasys

Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:42 AM

To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Subject: [XXE] Spell checking and abbreviations



The spell checker works very nice. However there's a tiny problem bugging me:

In a sentence, e.g. like this one, the 'like' word would be reported as 
misspelled because it follows a full stop.

Of course I can choose to ignore capitalising and only check this in a session 
once I'm done but is there another possibility to get rid of these marks?



Thanks,

Hans







Kassensysteme

Warenwirtschaft

Vernetzung

__________________________

Hans Artmann

Flüggenstr. 10

80639 München

Tel +49 89 17095721

Fax +49 89 17095722

Mob +49 151 17413090

www.arcasys.de<http://www.arcasys.de>



Ust-Id: DE261339573



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE









--

XMLmind XML Editor Support List

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

[cid:[email protected]]
Kassensysteme
Warenwirtschaft
Vernetzung
__________________________
Hans Artmann
Flüggenstr. 10
80639 München
Tel +49 89 17095721
Fax +49 89 17095722
Mob +49 151 17413090
www.arcasys.de<http://www.arcasys.de>

Ust-Id: DE261339573


<<inline: image001.gif>>

 
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to