Hi Jochen, Why do you see it as specific? Its just giving the user a choice whether to include the <string> tag or not for a string response. Given that it complies with the specification (and the specification actually recommends using <string>, it just has an ending note saying that if there is nothing than one can assume its a string), why should the user have to override the XmlWriter to just achieve this functionality?
best regards, Josef On 10/5/05, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josef Bajada wrote: > > > I think you are referring to XmlWriter here not XmlRpcWriter, right? > > Yes, sorry! > > > > If you think this might be useful for other users we can put it in. (I > > would rather have it included as part of the xml-rpc codebase so that > > I would be able to upgrade to future versions of xml-rpc without > > effecting this feature.) > > > > What do you think? > > I believe that my proposed changes aren't much larger than yours, > although your change is *very* specific and hardly required by anyone > but you. So, unless another committer intervenes, I am not open to > accept a patch forcing the "string" tag. > > > Sorry, > > Jochen >
