Hi Jochen, OK I understand your point of view.
I will look into what you had originally proposed and maybe commit something along those lines then. regards, Josef On 10/5/05, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josef Bajada wrote: > > > Why do you see it as specific? Its just giving the user a choice > > whether to include the <string> tag or not for a string response. > > Given that it complies with the specification (and the specification > > actually recommends using <string>, it just has an ending note saying > > that if there is nothing than one can assume its a string), why should > > the user have to override the XmlWriter to just achieve this > > functionality? > > There are *many* more syntactical details, that the XML-RPC may wish to > customize. Examples? May be, the base64 encoder should produce lines of > 76 characters or less? May be, some strings should be trimmed? Whatever. > Why should we prefer to implement a solution for just one specific > detail and not a solution that allows others to ensure their specific > wishes as well? > > > Jochen >
