In data martedì 13 aprile 2010 15:38:24, Lucio Crusca ha scritto: > > Is there any chance to get this exception from xmlrpc even when the reply > is NOT nil?
I reply myself: that exception has nothing to do with the reply being empty or nil, but it's caused by a <nil /> tag in the reply. Is this standard maybe in a new version of XMLRPC spec? If not, is it possible to have xmlrpc recognize it even without the ex: namespace?