On 13 Apr 2010, at 14:47, Lucio Crusca wrote: > In data martedì 13 aprile 2010 15:38:24, Lucio Crusca ha scritto: >> >> Is there any chance to get this exception from xmlrpc even when the reply >> is NOT nil? > > I reply myself: that exception has nothing to do with the reply being empty > or > nil, but it's caused by a > > <nil /> > > tag in the reply. Is this standard maybe in a new version of XMLRPC spec?
It\s not part of the XML-RPC spec. It was proposed a few years ago and Dave Winer (who invented XML-RPC and who "owns" the spec) explicitly and vehemently rejected it. John Wilson
