Does not work: 1) after this you need to do " libxmlsec-$(RELEASE)_SOURCES=...." :) 2) this breaks linking to libxmlsec.so -> libxmlsec-0.1.so.0.1.1
There is another approach (I've described it in the a separate mail) but I don't
like it much. And here is one more option of renaming everything in new release
to "xmlsec1", "libxmlsec1.*, etc. but I don't like it either.
Does having multiple static library version is really a strong requirement? If we can
skip it everything lays out perfectly.
Aleksey
John Belmonte wrote:
Aleksey Sanin wrote:
I would be happy to make this stuff seamless for anyone myself and I have no
problems with adding the "-release N.M" option. However, this does not solve
static libraries problem. They still have no version number at all. Ideas?
I don't know much about libtool, but I took a look at how it's done for libgimp. They just manually set something like the following in Makefile.am:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libxmlsec-$(RELEASE).la
Thanks, -John
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
