Aleksey Sanin wrote:
If you give people a safe with a provision to lock it, but they want toI think you misunderstood me. I never said that I do not want ot provide a safe.
leave it unlocked, not much you can do about it :).
But if you refuse to give them a safe without a locking provision, atleast
you're doing your part in discouraging bad habits....
The only thing I said is that I do not want to say that you shouldn't keep your
money w/o a safe if you understand what are you doing (for example,
you put your money in house with 24x7 guards.
Nothing else.The command line becames bigger and bigger :)
The difference between --privkey and --pkcs8 is marginal really.
I lean towards --privkey because it becomes immediately obvious
what the arg is. "pkcs8" may not be common knowledge.
In either case, your test scripts will need another parameter in orderOh, yes. You are right :(
to support all pvt key formats (der, pem, pkcs8 der, pkcs8 pem).
I'll send the changes in a few days.Let me know if you want me to help you with something :)
Aleksey
I'm attaching the changes. There's a new optional parameter to the test
scripts. By default, the tests will run with certs/pubkeys in der format, and
private keys in pkcs8-der format.
thanks
-Tej
diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
tarball.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
